Self-absented portraiture

Nigel Shafran is a fine art photographer and uses his personal life as his subject. He does not appear in any of his images, but he communicates his habits and daily routines. In the series ‘Washing Up’ he takes photos of his sink are before and after meals and accompanies the image with text captions describing the meal.

Nigel Shafran – Washing-Up 2000

The course notes state that it is intimate, beautifully lit and composed. Really? Dishes and utensils around a sink? I have looked at his other series and they appear more of the same and I am struggling to understand the artistic merit. It appears to be the photography equivalent of reality TV, or a Facebook post from someone you vaguely know letting you know what they had for tea.

Nigel Shafran – Washing-Up 2000

The questions to this exercise provide some additional context relating to gender. I don’t see that a series such as this would be favoured by either a man or a woman. If anything it is about what utensils were used in the making of the food. By not including people he is not attributing stereotypes to the act of domestic life. Maybe it was more profound at the start of the 21st Century but I don’t feel that this series carries much weight on gender politics.

I also struggled with the change in portrait landscape choices. The scenes drain away any emotion from me as a viewer. I imagine there is more context that I need to research. Something about the artists that means that the kitchen is a significant place for them or some reason that these tasks are difficult.

Wolfgang Tillmans – Studio Still Life 2014

I have seen similarly composed images by Wolfgang Tillmans of items on his desk. I accepted these fairly easily but I think that was because I was aware of his other work and the subjects he chose. His range of subjects and methods add gravitas to the work he produces. If that was the only type of work he produced I would probably struggle to understand it but as a series looking at the workspace of a photographer I found interesting.

Maybe I have more against kitchens and dishes than I had realised. If I like looking at an artists desk why do I dislike looking at another artists kitchen? What would I feel if it was Wolfgang Tillman’s kitchen?

This has been quite an interesting exercise and has drawn out more passion than I had before writing this piece.

Childhood memory

In assignment 2 I used photos of myself as a child. In part 3 I have started to research photographers who have re-enacted old family photos. The artists have chosen self-portraits and either played their younger selves or other members of their family.

For this exercise I felt I wanted to produce a straight photograph with myself included. I wanted to choose a good memory having dealt with negative events in my last assignment. This made me think about how I wanted to portray myself. How could I make it interesting and show feelings? I also wanted to continue practising indoor lighting as I have found this very difficult up to now.

Nostalgia was going to be the major concept and I decided to re-enact a typical Saturday morning playing Subbuteo on my own listening to music on Radio 1 and to my LPs. This was probably around 1977/78. I thought I would set up the pitch and the players and have a Radio 1 logo and album cover in the background.

Subbuteo catalogue 1978

With this in mind I went in to the loft and retrieved my box of Subbuteo teams and accessories. On opening the box I found a catalogue and inside there was a photo of a boy playing Subbuteo. I remembered this photo and decided to re-enact that photo. I had the goals and the pitch side photographers. I felt this added a nice relationship with what I am doing now. I changed my shirt for a similar checked style as the boy in the photo.

I setup my lamp and tripod and tried out my various lenses to reproduce the required depth of field. This was the most difficult aspect which in the end I have not achieved. Focusing and  the over exposure of my hand and crossbar were problematic. However, I think I have been quite successful in getting up close as without the catalogue image I would probably have gone for a wider angle shot which would not have portrayed the action. Interestingly it was effectively a still life. Nothing was moving.

I imported my image in to lightroom, cropped it to the same aspect ratio and also warmed it up a little. The final image is not as sharp as I would have liked and I will try out some other setups using more natural light.

Subbuteo re-enactment 2017

I decided to create my own composition and chose to use one of the photographer figures. A typical self-portrait idea is for the photographer to capture their reflection in glass or a mirror. I decided to get the photographer to stare straight at the camera and thereby ignoring the action on the pitch. He would also be staring at me, the photographer.

Subbuteo Photography 2017

I thought this was an intriguing scene. I added myself in the form of my ‘flick-to-kick’ finger. Overall I was pleased with the outcome as it captures a childhood memory and adds the element of ‘Who is the photographer now?’. In this scene I do become a subject of interest even though you can’t see my face. The figurine brings me in to the frame even though it is only made of plastic and has no emotions or reactions.

Masquerade

 

Trish Morrissey [1] uses herself in her projects but does not see them as traditional self-portraits. She sees that she is the protagonist where she plays other characters. Her projects have humour but have deeper meaning regarding family relationships and relationships with strangers. In her series Front she places herself amongst strangers on the beach to create a family snapshot. These are interesting as you look more at the strangers and imagine their lives and who has been replaced in the photo, who is missing?

I don’t think I would be comfortable if a photographer asked to pose with my family. I would need to understand more about them and their project brief. I imagine she went up to people on the spur of the moment although she possibly discussed some details with them. It is unlikely that many people would be comfortable. My experience of people on British beaches is once they have their area of sand then there is not much interaction between groups. It’s like how the majority of people don’t interact with their next door neighbours at home. They just transfer the same rules to a beach side setting.

In Seven Years Morrissey recreates old family photos with her sister. They don’t just play themselves they also dress as their male family members wearing fashions of the time. These are quite fun but contain nostalgia and raise questions of the past and where the family are today.

I have a number of issues with Nikki S. Lee’s work [2] where she takes on the physical appearance of various sub-cultures and ethnic groups. She is an American-Korean whose work I see as being more about her than the groups she is portraying. She appears to be playing up to stereotypes and to my view the work appears to mock rather than communicate anything new to viewers.

Maybe if Lee knew the individuals eg. friends/family then it would take on a more sincere meaning. There is a suggestion in some of the photos that she has ‘blackened’ up which is a controversial approach, unlike Morrissey who appears as herself but placed in somebody elses scene.

Reference:

  1. http://www.trishmorrissey.com/
  2. Nikki S. Lee – Projects

Autobiographical self portraiture

This post looks at the self portraiture work of the following photographers:

Francesca Woodman (1958-81) – Space² [1]
Gillian Wearing – Album (2003)
Elina Brotherus – Annonciation (2012)
Vivian Maier – Self-portraits

The questions posed by the course notes are?
• How do these images make you feel?
• Do you think there’s an element of narcissism or self-indulgence in focusing on your own identity in this way?
• What’s the significance of Brotherus’s nakedness?
• Can such images ‘work’ for an outsider without accompanying text?
• Do you think any of these artists are also addressing wider issues beyond the purely personal?

Woodman and Wearing both hide their identity [4] in their work although they are physically present. Woodman uses mirrors and motion to obscure herself from view. Wearing uses prosthetic masks. Both are saying “here I am” but add intrigue by being remote or partially hidden.

Space², Francesca Woodman

Woodman places herself in her images even though she is not necessarily the main point of the work. An example is her response to an assignment where she was tasked to display a particular space by emphasising its character [1]. Her response is creative in that she includes the properties, and limitations of photography being 2D. This is suggested by the title of the series, Space², referencing area rather than volume (cubed). The fact that she is in the image she is not recognisable as she captures the movement of her body within the room. The square format and her movement highlights a lack of space and being enclosed and trapped. It also gives the impression of being erased.

This self-erasure notion is possibly what Susan Bright is referring to when she said “It’s difficult not to read Woodman’s many self-portraits…as alluding to a troubled state of mind“.  Another Woodman image, Self-deceipt 4, shows her naked standing in front a of a mottled wall. S hides her face with a mirror that reflects back to the camera leaving a white space where her head would be. The mirror also reflects on to her skin giving a similar mottled effect as the wall and blending in as a result.

The title of this image, Self-deceipt 4, ‘questions the authenticity of any act of self-portraiture’ [4. p14]. This is an interesting point as the author can portray themselves in any way they see fit, as is the case in all aspects of photography (an artistic choice). Just because it is a self portrait does not make it a true reflection of yourself. In Woodman’s case she probably is trying to communicate something truthful about herself to the world as, sadly, she committed suicide at the age of 22.

In her series Album, Wearing planned and prepared meticulously to produce self portraits wearing prosthetic masks of her younger self and family members. The compositions were re-enactments of old family photos. For assignment 2 I flippantly said I would need a time machine to produce a photo of my younger self. Well here an artist has used their imagination and creativity to produce just that.

The results are fairly freaky once you know what she has done. She examines family and relationships and raises questions of how our families make us who we are. I covered a similar theme with assignment 2 although I emphasised the events of my life and expressly stated need for support from my family.

In Higgins’ book [4] Wearing is quoted as saying ‘you’re expected to know so much from the look of someone. I’ve always thought that was very limited.  It’s too easy to misjudge’. This is a similar view to Woodman’s where the authenticity of self-portraits is questioned. The viewer is being informed that there is more to person than what you see in a  two dimensional image.

Brotherus’ self-portraits in Annonciation, rather than hide and obscure her life and emotions, puts it all out there and in focus. No gimmicks or allusion. Once you know the subject is of her attempts at IVF she conveys the heartache, pain and emotional exhaustion of repeated failed treatments.

In this series she not only tells of her own heartache but of all the other women who have set out and failed in their attempts to have children. The use of nakedness is never more appropriate than it is in a series like this. She can’t give any more to the viewer than this. There’s more to this than nude shots. The emotional strain can be seen throughout the series from quiet reflective seated scenes to more dramatic upsetting scenes. Bruising, medication and the negative pregnancy tests all add to the upset created by failed treatments.

I’ve  always been unsure of nudity in photographic art as it is voyeuristic and sometimes seedy. I am always wary of a male photographer justifying a nude female subject. However, for self-portraits it’s the artists choice. The question still remains is it self promotion? I understand the use of nudity in Brothrus’ series as the subject is clear and she shows her face. Woodman uses nudity but covers her face and her message is less obvious and certainly more sinister. This has a lot to do with knowing that she took her own life and at such a young age. It would be interesting to read reviews of her work prior to her death. I think her message becomes clearer with the aid of hindsight.

Vivian Maier (1926-2009) was another photographer whose work became known after her death. In fact she was not known as a photographer (her day job was a nanny) and her work highlighted her outside interest. Her self portrait work is of her reflection in mirrors and windows with the camera on show. These images work as a record of how she wanted to be portrayed rather than how she was seen in her day to day life.

References:

  1. Space², Providence, Rhode Island, 1975-1978 Tate.org.uk
  2. Gillian Wearing, Album (2003) – Guardian article [accessed 23/11/17]
  3. Elina Brotherus – Annonciation (2012)
  4. Higgins. J, Why It Doesn’t Have To Be In Focus, Thames & Hudson, 2016
  5. Rainbird. M, Can you see me now? Assignment 2 post
  6. Vivian Maier website [accessed 21/11/17]